<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
    xmlns:s='http://snipsnap.org/rdf/snip-schema#'
    xml:base='http://www.peerbox.com:8668/rdf'>
    <s:Snip rdf:about='http://www.peerbox.com:8668/rdf#start/2006-03-21/2'
         s:name='start/2006-03-21/2'
         s:cUser='kgr'
         s:oUser='kgr'
         s:mUser='kgr'>
        <s:content>1 AJAX the Singing Frog {anchor:AJAX the Singing Frog}&#xA;Over the years, whenever someone shows be something “new &amp; cool” in HTML/CSS/Javascript/AJAX (like menus, tabs, line-drawing, sortable-tables, space-invaders, etc), I get the feeling that what I’m seeing is akin to a singing frog.  The impressive thing about a singing frog isn’t necessarily the quality of its singing, but rather, that it can sing at all.  We’ve had line-drawing, menus, tables, etc. for decades, so why should they be impressive now?  Why have we put ourselves in a position where we have made programming so artificially difficult that we are now impressed by features which were routine twenty years ago?  </s:content>
        <s:mTime>2006-03-21 11:35:35.184</s:mTime>
        <s:cTime>2006-03-21 11:35:35.184</s:cTime>
        <s:comments
             rdf:type='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Bag'/>
        <s:snipLinks>
            <rdf:Bag>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource='http://www.peerbox.com:8668/rdf#2006'/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource='#kgr'/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource='#snipsnap-index'/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource='#snipsnap-search'/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource='http://www.peerbox.com:8668/rdf#start/2005-12-25/1'/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource='http://www.peerbox.com:8668/rdf#start/2006-03-23/1'/>
            </rdf:Bag>
        </s:snipLinks>
        <s:attachments
             rdf:type='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Bag'/>
    </s:Snip>
</rdf:RDF>
